Finally figured the photobucket transfer !
Joan
Joan
↧
Re: Washburn C50SN
↧
Re: Washburn C50SN
WOW!!!!
That's a VERY nice looking classical! I particularly like the rosette (that decorative circle around the soundhole).
Having played classicals for about 2/3 of my life (won't say how old I am, but the protoplasm is older than aluminum foil), I c...
That's a VERY nice looking classical! I particularly like the rosette (that decorative circle around the soundhole).
Having played classicals for about 2/3 of my life (won't say how old I am, but the protoplasm is older than aluminum foil), I c...
↧
↧
Re: Washburn C50SN
Thanks again YerDugliness; the fretmarkers are there on the side. And thanks for the compliments on Stella-luna ( I've actually named my guitar). My son picked it up several years ago ( while he spent a summer here ) and decided he wanted to learn ho...
↧
Re: New recording with my Washburn Hawk '80
A funny collaboration:
https://soundcloud.com/pierrou-tissan-private/bei-mir-bist-du-sheen-fingerstyle-pierrou
![8)]( "Cool")
![8)]( "Cool")
https://soundcloud.com/pierrou-tissan-private/bei-mir-bist-du-sheen-fingerstyle-pierrou
↧
Re: Washburn Woodstock 5868596, what year ?
Welcome to the forum. You most likely have a EA40 Woodstock. Built in 1985. Here is a bit more info.
EA40 WOODSTOCK
- single sharp cutaway dreadnought style, mahogany top, oval soundhole, bound body, abalone purfling/rosette, mahogany back/sides/nec...
EA40 WOODSTOCK
- single sharp cutaway dreadnought style, mahogany top, oval soundhole, bound body, abalone purfling/rosette, mahogany back/sides/nec...
↧
↧
1897 Style New Model serial..21 107606
Hi, trying to date this cute little guitar. Can anyone help?...thanks, jacob
↧
Re: Washburn Woodstock 5868596, what year ?
Hello,
Thank for reply !
But ar you shure ?there is something i cant understand, eq with sliders starts with 1987 year, so that cant be 1985,
thanks for ,, wecome in forum,, and sorry for my english .
Bartek
Thank for reply !
But ar you shure ?there is something i cant understand, eq with sliders starts with 1987 year, so that cant be 1985,
thanks for ,, wecome in forum,, and sorry for my english .
Bartek
↧
Re: Washburn Woodstock 5868596, what year ?
But ar you shure ?there is something i cant understand, eq with sliders starts with 1987 year, so that cant be 1985,
thanks for ,, wecome in forum,, and sorry for my english . ...
↧
Re: Trying to identify v.old GEORGE WASHBURN guitar
Updated my posting with pics embedded! Thanks for the help.
↧
↧
Re: Trying to identify v.old GEORGE WASHBURN guitar
Doesn't really look like one of the parlors from that long ago...
We'll wait and see what the historians say...there are a few on this forum who know a lot about the older Washburn products.
Cheers!
Dugly![8)]( "Cool")
We'll wait and see what the historians say...there are a few on this forum who know a lot about the older Washburn products.
Cheers!
Dugly
↧
Re: Trying to identify v.old GEORGE WASHBURN guitar
any numbers on the headstock or anywhere else I can tell you that the bridge is wrong and replaced to accomidate gut strings would have been steel originally
↧
Re: 1897 Style New Model serial..21 107606
without pictures nope impossible to identify
↧
Re: Trying to identify v.old GEORGE WASHBURN guitar
Hi, Ship!!! Great to see you posting again!
The body shape doesn't look like one of the old parlors, the lower bout is too large....am I correct about that?
Cheers!
Dugly![8)]( "Cool")
The body shape doesn't look like one of the old parlors, the lower bout is too large....am I correct about that?
Cheers!
Dugly
↧
↧
follow up
A quick detail question please!
Does the serial number have any bearing on it's date of manufacture or were they assigned erratically or randomly to the point that it is not a decent point of reference?
Beyond this I have some additional information. ...
Does the serial number have any bearing on it's date of manufacture or were they assigned erratically or randomly to the point that it is not a decent point of reference?
Beyond this I have some additional information. ...
↧
Re: Trying to identify v.old GEORGE WASHBURN guitar
On the bridge.......you are most likely of course right in saying that it was replaced! It just was done rather well in that there is no obvious evidence of it being replace or of it being a replacement bridge in terms of congruence with the instrume...
↧
Re: Trying to identify v.old GEORGE WASHBURN guitar
Yah, Der Dugliness is on the right track (as usual). I'm not having any luck at a face-on view of it, but remember that the parlours often had "narrow shoulders," so the butt looked large in proportion.
The topic recurs all the time, because people lea...
The topic recurs all the time, because people lea...
↧
Re: Trying to identify v.old GEORGE WASHBURN guitar
Thanks ....very helpful. I certainly did not think it was worth thousands of dollars! Being in the business I have bought many guitars over time and no better than to froth at the mouth over an obscure find from a minor brand. My tech thought it was...
↧
↧
Re: Trying to identify v.old GEORGE WASHBURN guitar
no offence to your tech but he should know that is braz rosewood and definitely the bridge is a replacement and the guitar could be from around 1930 did you find any numbers stamped on the back of the headstock if not it will be the 30's then and as fo...
↧
Re: Trying to identify v.old GEORGE WASHBURN guitar
no offence to your tech but he should know that is braz rosewood and definitely the bridge is a replacement and the guitar could be from around 1930 did you find any numb...
↧
Re: Washburn C50SN
Yeah...that F chord was a bugger for me, too....until I figured out how easy it was to just use a barred E at the first fret. Problem solved!
Lots of people have problems with the F chord...I use the classical position and so it's just a matter of coc...
Lots of people have problems with the F chord...I use the classical position and so it's just a matter of coc...
↧